Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(1): 69, 2023 Dec 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38157081

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We investigated whether twice-daily administration of a bilayer tablet formulation of tramadol (35% immediate-release [IR] and 65% sustained-release) is as effective as four-times-daily IR tramadol capsules for managing cancer pain. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, active-comparator, non-inferiority study enrolled opioid-naïve patients using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or acetaminophen (paracetamol) to manage cancer pain and self-reported pain (mean value over 3 days ≥ 25 mm on a 100-mm visual analog scale [VAS]). Patients were randomized to either bilayer tablets or IR capsules for 14 days. The starting dose was 100 mg/day and could be escalated to 300 mg/day. The primary endpoint was the change in VAS (averaged over 3 days) for pain at rest from baseline to end of treatment/discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, 251 patients were randomized. The baseline mean VAS at rest was 47.67 mm (range: 25.6-82.7 mm). In the full analysis set, the adjusted mean change in VAS was - 22.07 and - 19.08 mm in the bilayer tablet (n = 124) and IR capsule (n = 120) groups, respectively. The adjusted mean difference was - 2.99 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] - 7.96 to 1.99 mm). The upper 95% CI was less than the predefined non-inferiority margin of 7.5 mm. Other efficacy outcomes were similar in both groups. Adverse events were reported for 97/126 (77.0%) and 101/125 (80.8%) patients in the bilayer tablet and IR capsule groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily administration of bilayer tramadol tablets was as effective as four-times-daily administration of IR capsules regarding the improvement in pain VAS, with comparable safety outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-184143/jRCT2080224082 (October 5, 2018).


Assuntos
Dor do Câncer , Neoplasias , Tramadol , Humanos , Acetaminofen/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor do Câncer/tratamento farmacológico , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Dor/tratamento farmacológico , Comprimidos/uso terapêutico , Tramadol/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Pain Pract ; 23(3): 277-289, 2023 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36478501

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We investigated the efficacy and safety of twice-daily bilayer sustained-release tramadol hydrochloride tablets (35% immediate-release; 65% sustained-release) in patients with postherpetic neuralgia. METHODS: This was a Phase III treatment-withdrawal study with 1-4-week dose-escalation, 1-week fixed-dose, and 4-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal periods performed at 43 medical institutions in Japan. Patients aged ≥20 years, ≥3 months after the onset of herpes zoster with localized, persistent pain despite fixed-dose analgesics for ≥2 weeks before enrollment were eligible. Patients started tramadol at 100 mg/day and its dose escalated to a maximum of 400 mg/day to achieve a reduction in their Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain of ≥2 points. Eligible patients were randomized to continue tramadol or switched to placebo for 4 weeks (double-blind period). Patients were withdrawn due to inadequate analgesia (NRS deteriorated on ≥2 consecutive days) or their request. RESULTS: Overall, 252 patients started tramadol and 173 were randomized (tramadol: 85; placebo: 88). Tramadol was superior to placebo for the primary endpoint (time from randomization to an inadequate analgesic effect) with log-rank test p = 0.0005. The hazard ratio was 0.353 (95% confidence interval 0.190-0.657) in favor of tramadol and fewer patients in the tramadol group experienced inadequate analgesic effects (16.9% vs. 39.8%). Adverse events in ≥10% of patients in the open-label period were constipation (43.8%), nausea (34.9%), somnolence (18.5%), and dizziness (11.6%). The frequencies of adverse events in the double-blind period were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Sustained-release tramadol tablets with an immediate-release component are effective and well tolerated for managing postherpetic neuralgia.


Assuntos
Neuralgia Pós-Herpética , Tramadol , Humanos , Neuralgia Pós-Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Preparações de Ação Retardada/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Comprimidos/uso terapêutico , Método Duplo-Cego , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Clin Drug Investig ; 42(5): 403-416, 2022 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35435639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knee osteoarthritis pain is a chronic form of pain for which conventional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs may provide insufficient analgesia. Twice-daily tramadol hydrochloride (65% sustained-release/35% immediate-release) bilayer tablets are a novel formulation of tramadol developed for managing chronic pain. The objectives of this study were to examine the effectiveness and safety of this formulation in patients with chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group, treatment-withdrawal study. Patients with a reduction in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for pain of ≥2 points during a 1-3-week, open-label, tramadol dose-escalation period (100-300 mg/day) were randomized to continue tramadol or switched to placebo for 4 weeks (double-blind period). Patients with inadequate efficacy (increase in NRS ≥2 points/patient request) were withdrawn. Outcomes included the time to inadequate analgesic efficacy from randomization (primary endpoint), the cumulative retention rate, and safety. RESULTS: Overall, 249 and 160 patients entered the dose-escalation and double-blind periods, respectively (tramadol 79; placebo 81). Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed superiority of tramadol (log-rank p = 0.042), and a hazard ratio of 0.50 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.25-0.99). Documentation of an inadequate analgesic effect was less frequent in the tramadol group (15.4%, 95% CI 8.2-25.3% vs. 30.9%, 95% CI 21.1-42.1%). The cumulative retention rate was greater in the tramadol group (83.7% vs. 69.0%). Adverse events occurred in 80.6% (200/248) of patients in the open-label period, and in 38.5% (30/78) and 13.6% (11/81) of patients in the tramadol and placebo groups, respectively, in the double-blind period. Opioid-associated adverse events, such as nausea, vomiting, constipation, somnolence, and dizziness, were the most frequent events. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the analgesic efficacy and safety of sustained-release tramadol tablets with an immediate-release component for chronic knee osteoarthritis pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: JapicCTI-132103 (Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center; registration date February 25, 2015).


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Osteoartrite do Joelho , Tramadol , Analgésicos/uso terapêutico , Analgésicos Opioides , Dor Crônica/diagnóstico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Osteoartrite do Joelho/complicações , Osteoartrite do Joelho/tratamento farmacológico , Comprimidos , Tramadol/efeitos adversos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...